<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 30 Second Tip For Phone Number Integrity In Local SEO Listings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoroi.com/seo-roi-quality/30-second-tip-for-phone-number-integrity-in-local-seo-listings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoroi.com/seo-roi-quality/30-second-tip-for-phone-number-integrity-in-local-seo-listings/</link>
	<description>SEO Services For Serious ROI. Blog Posts For Serious SEOs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speaking At Pubcon On Usability, Conversion &#38; SEO !</title>
		<link>http://seoroi.com/seo-roi-quality/30-second-tip-for-phone-number-integrity-in-local-seo-listings/comment-page-1/#comment-16197</link>
		<dc:creator>Speaking At Pubcon On Usability, Conversion &#38; SEO !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoroi.com/?p=1714#comment-16197</guid>
		<description>[...] vision of driving traffic, the light at the end of the tunnel (or funnel?) gets forgotten. Will a local and toll-free number mess up Google local listings? Will content available via AJAX or Flash (for better user experience) be hard for search engines [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vision of driving traffic, the light at the end of the tunnel (or funnel?) gets forgotten. Will a local and toll-free number mess up Google local listings? Will content available via AJAX or Flash (for better user experience) be hard for search engines [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.668 seconds -->

