<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analytics &amp; Attribution: Which Source Gets Credit For the Conversion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoroi.com/seo-faq/which-source-gets-credit-for-conversion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoroi.com/seo-faq/which-source-gets-credit-for-conversion/</link>
	<description>SEO Services For Serious ROI. Blog Posts For Serious SEOs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Advertising Made Simple &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Giving Credit To View-Throughs For Site Conversions - AdvertisingDay.com</title>
		<link>http://seoroi.com/seo-faq/which-source-gets-credit-for-conversion/comment-page-1/#comment-15902</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Advertising Made Simple &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Giving Credit To View-Throughs For Site Conversions - AdvertisingDay.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoroi.com/?p=174#comment-15902</guid>
		<description>[...] increasingly popular question in attribution management and in advertising measurement is what effect ads – that were viewed but not clicked on – have. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] increasingly popular question in attribution management and in advertising measurement is what effect ads – that were viewed but not clicked on – have. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Goldenberg</title>
		<link>http://seoroi.com/seo-faq/which-source-gets-credit-for-conversion/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Goldenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoroi.com/?p=174#comment-863</guid>
		<description>James, thanks for sharing that. It&#039;s really an excellent post and I learned a lot. Goes into way more depth than my post, and seems to agree in substance. That said, I&#039;m not sure time on site would be equal between the three sources; by the time they&#039;re towards knowing what they want, checkout should be very quick...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, thanks for sharing that. It&#8217;s really an excellent post and I learned a lot. Goes into way more depth than my post, and seems to agree in substance. That said, I&#8217;m not sure time on site would be equal between the three sources; by the time they&#8217;re towards knowing what they want, checkout should be very quick&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://seoroi.com/seo-faq/which-source-gets-credit-for-conversion/comment-page-1/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoroi.com/?p=174#comment-850</guid>
		<description>My favorite post ever on this subject (ROI or Conversion attribution) was written by Avinash Kaushik and his team in March...check it out, videos and all! Fantastic post:

http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/2008/03/standard-metrics-revisited-5-conversion-roi-attribution.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite post ever on this subject (ROI or Conversion attribution) was written by Avinash Kaushik and his team in March&#8230;check it out, videos and all! Fantastic post:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/2008/03/standard-metrics-revisited-5-conversion-roi-attribution.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/2008/03/standard-metrics-revisited-5-conversion-roi-attribution.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.841 seconds -->

