<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Face of Reciprocal Links: Widgetbait</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoroi.com/case-studies/the-new-face-of-reciprocal-links-widgetbait/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoroi.com/case-studies/the-new-face-of-reciprocal-links-widgetbait/</link>
	<description>SEO Services For Serious ROI. Blog Posts For Serious SEOs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:35:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MikeTek</title>
		<link>http://seoroi.com/case-studies/the-new-face-of-reciprocal-links-widgetbait/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeTek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 14:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoroi.com/?p=140#comment-409</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, Gab - thanks for sharing this.  Looks like 0atmeal&#039;s public success has echoed through the halls.  I&#039;d expect this tactic will be far more successful than a standard reciprocal linking campaign (asking pretty please with sugar on top), but it&#039;s spam nonetheless.  I&#039;m still taken aback by the fact that 0atmeal is essentially black-listed by the G at this point.  I guess it wasn&#039;t enough to dump what had to be countless hours of his hard work down the drain...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, Gab &#8211; thanks for sharing this.  Looks like 0atmeal&#8217;s public success has echoed through the halls.  I&#8217;d expect this tactic will be far more successful than a standard reciprocal linking campaign (asking pretty please with sugar on top), but it&#8217;s spam nonetheless.  I&#8217;m still taken aback by the fact that 0atmeal is essentially black-listed by the G at this point.  I guess it wasn&#8217;t enough to dump what had to be countless hours of his hard work down the drain&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy</title>
		<link>http://seoroi.com/case-studies/the-new-face-of-reciprocal-links-widgetbait/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Willy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoroi.com/?p=140#comment-407</guid>
		<description>I tried validating myself as a site owner... they require adding a backlink to your site to validate. I said no thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried validating myself as a site owner&#8230; they require adding a backlink to your site to validate. I said no thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
